Management Review Report Sample

Just as any other academic course, management will definitely include assignments that will require a student to read and analyze various types of sources. Such assignment may demand that one either summarizes a source, or analyzes it, or both. This paper, Management Review Report Sample, is the latter option. It will provide a short summary with a review of the article’s credibility. Thus, this Management Review Report Sample will serve as an exemplary variant of how one may summarize and evaluate an article.

hacer en caso de huracan

The article titled “Collaboration and Leadership for Effective Emergency Management” by William L. Waugh Jr. and Gregory Streib presents a result of research that harbors rather intricate ideas and serves as an immediate encouragement to action. Notably, the facts of this research expose the disengagement and the inappropriateness of the Federal Emergency Management System during the rampage of the hurricane Katrina. Consequently, the article discusses the relevance of the command and control system of the Department of Homeland Security within the FEMS. Also, it forwards its arguments related to the collaboration approach, which stresses that a logical and healthy communication and functions division will work in the said sector better. The research analyzed data on the evolution of the homeland security from the civil defense to all-hazards. Moreover, the article invokes some natural disasters and how the DHS has dealt with them to provide a distinction between the mentioned two forms of cooperation. As a result, the study proves that such a sector of paramount activities can not be overseen by a single person, because it is too complex a network and a collaborative approach will work out here better.

That being said, the article signifies that the emergency control is a field that is greater than just the emergency response one. Consequently, despite the level and strength of leadership skills, the command and control system simply is not able to cover all the required areas that demand prognosis and reaction. Super control and strict subordination in the DHS and FEMS cannot adequately cope with the said field anymore. Due to the involvement of multiple sectors in the emergency management, such as legal, HR, urban, financial and other ones, it needs an efficient collaborative system that will harmonize all the process.

Regardless of the scrupulous and extensive research of the theoretical and empirical basis, the scholarly work does not include auxiliary appendixes. Comprehensible and graphical stats and charts would greatly compliment the article and provide an opportunity to savor the information better. In addition, the contemporary FEMS model has multiple application in various countries. An analysis of the foreign experience in the relevant field and its comparison to the US situation would be beneficial. Also, considering the article’s context, the scholars should have attempted to design their model of a collaborative system and its strategic interaction framework. The relevant findings have to be practical and forward well-established recommendations for the government to consider in its administrative emergency field.

References

  • Agranoff, R. & McGuire, M. (2003). Collaborative public management: new strategies for local governments (pp. 39-42). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.
  • Altay, N. & Green, W. (2006). OR/MS research in disaster operations management. European Journal Of Operational Research, 175(1), 475-493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.05.016
  • National Disaster Recovery Framework. (2016). FEMA. Retrieved 15 September 2016, from http://www.fema.gov/national-disaster-recovery-framework
  • RAND Corporation,. (2015). Intra-Action Report — A Dynamic Tool for Emergency Managers and Policymakers (pp. 5-24). Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
  • Waugh, W. L., & Streib, G. (2006). Collaboration and leadership for effective emergency management. Public administration review, 66(s1), 131-140.
5.00 avg. rating (99% score) - 1 vote